Predicting Student Participation in Peer Reviews in MOOCs
نویسندگان
چکیده
Assessing and providing feedback to thousands of student artefacts in MOOCs is an unfeasible task for instructors. Peer review, a well-known pedagogical approach that offers various learning gains, has been a common approach to address this practical challenge. However, low student participation is a potential barrier to the success of peer reviews. The present study proposes an approach to predict student participation in peer reviews in a MOOC context, which can be utilized to achieve an effective peer-review activity. We attempt to predict the number of different peer works that students will review for each of four assignments based on their past activities in the course. Results show that students’ preceding activities were predictive of their participation in peer reviews starting from the first assignment, and that the prediction accuracy improved considerably with the inclusion of past peer-review activities.
منابع مشابه
Predicting Peer-Review Participation at Large Scale Using an Ensemble Learning Method
Peer review has been an effective approach for the assessment of massive numbers of student artefacts in MOOCs. However, low student participation is a barrier that can result in inefficiencies in the implementation of peer reviews, disrupting student learning. In this regard, knowing earlier the estimate number of peer works that students will review may bring numerous pedagogical utilities in...
متن کاملAssessing Writing in MOOCs: Automated Essay Scoring and Calibrated Peer ReviewTM
Joshua Brown, Adam Mikeal, and Alysha Clark provided substantial feedback that greatly enhanced the value and clarity of the information in this article. Abstract Two of the largest Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) organizations have chosen different methods for the way they will score and provide feedback on essays students submit. EdX, MIT and Harvard’s non-profit MOOC federation, recently a...
متن کاملINTEGRATING MOOCs IN BLENDED COURSES
Recent studies appreciate that "MOOCs bring an impetus of reform, research and innovation to the Academy" [9]. Even though MOOCs are usually developed and delivered as independent online courses, experiments to wrap formal university courses around existing MOOCs are reported by teachers and researchers in different articles [3], [4], [8], [17]. This paper describes a new approach, in which the...
متن کاملSelf- and Peer Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses
Open online distance learning in higher education has quickly gained popularity, expanded, and evolved, with Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as the most recent development. New web technologies allow for scalable ways to deliver video lecture content, implement social forums and track student progress in MOOCs. However, we remain limited in our ability to assess complex and open-ended stude...
متن کاملTuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs
In massive open online courses (MOOCs), peer grading serves as a critical tool for scaling the grading of complex, openended assignments to courses with tens or hundreds of thousands of students. But despite promising initial trials, it does not always deliver accurate results compared to human experts. In this paper, we develop algorithms for estimating and correcting for grader biases and rel...
متن کامل